Nick Paul
5.0
Game Grade
6.1
Production
5.0
Quality

Both halves of the grade came in low. 0 goals and 0 assists on 0 shots, 0.00 expected goals of his own. His team was out-chanced by UTA 0.14 to 0.68 at five-on-five with him on the ice.

0
Goals
0
Assists
—
Expected goals
0
Shots on goal
0
Shot attempts
14:01
Time on ice
-2
Plus/minus
2-4
Faceoffs
2
Hits
0:20
Power-play time
1
Takeaways
0
Penalties drawn
His shot attempts
on goalmissed✕blockedironbigger = better chance

Why this rating

Every ingredient, in goals above what an average player at his position does in the same ice time. Bars to the right added to the score; bars to the left cost him. The parts add up — nothing about the number is hidden.

Production 6.1
Blocks+0.10
Faceoffs-0.02
Quality 5.0
Chances created on ice-0.13
Goals for on ice-0.22
Chances allowed on ice-0.40
Goals against on ice-0.51
Power-play chances on ice+0.03
Penalty-kill goals against on ice+0.02
Usage: competition minus teammates-0.01

How the Game Grade works — the full formula.

Finishing: what he deserved

Goals scored against the goals his chances were worth. One game of finishing is mostly luck, which is exactly why Production and Quality are separate numbers.

Goals scored
0
Expected goals
0.00

0 attempts: 0 on goal, 0 missed, 0 blocked. 0 of his own unblocked attempts came from the high-danger area (dashed outline on the map); a blocked shot carries no expected goals.

On-ice impact, five-on-five

TOR on the left, UTA on the right — first with him on the ice, then with him on the bench. Counts, never percentages.

With Paul on the ice
0.14
Expected goals
0.68
4
Shot attempts
20
0
High-danger chances
6
1
Scoring chances
10
Without him
0.86
Expected goals
1.14
26
Shot attempts
25
6
High-danger chances
7
11
Scoring chances
8

Who he played against

The UTA skaters he saw most, by shared ice time, and how the chances went in those minutes — the "was it a hard night?" context no score sheet has.

Kailer Yamamoto RW · 7:39 together
0.31
0.44
Anders Lee LW · 7:28 together
0.22
0.45
Barrett Hayton C · 7:07 together
0.31
0.44
Andrew Peeke D · 6:28 together
0.13
0.10
John Marino D · 5:33 together
0.31
0.56

Expected goals for TOR (left) and UTA (right) while both were on the ice. Linemates: McKenna 9:02 · Sissons 8:06 · Stecher 6:22 · Ekman-Larsson 5:49.

Score sheet by situation

The raw line, split by game state.

SituationTOIGASOGAttixGxG forxG agst
Five-on-five11:5800000.000.140.68
Even strength11:5900000.000.140.68
Power play0:2000000.000.090.00
Penalty kill1:4200000.000.210.10

Where this game ranks for him

Every one of his 7 rated games this season as a dot; this one highlighted.

6th best of 7 by Game Grade
456789
By Quality alone
456789
By Production alone
456789

Game timeline

All 19 shifts across the game, with goals and penalties on top. When he played, how he was used late, and whether he was on the ice for the goals. Ice time per period underneath.

1ST · 5:362ND · 4:193RD · 4:061ST 1:17–2:15 · 58s1ST 4:39–5:39 · 60s1ST 9:58–11:16 · 78s1ST 13:35–14:55 · 80s1ST 17:50–18:50 · 60s2ND 1:58–2:36 · 38s2ND 5:16–6:16 · 60s2ND 7:23–7:53 · 30s2ND 10:06–10:52 · 46s2ND 13:56–14:17 · 21s2ND 17:03–17:13 · 10s2ND 17:59–18:53 · 54s3RD 1:13–1:52 · 39s3RD 4:50–5:30 · 40s3RD 7:12–7:49 · 37s3RD 9:07–9:44 · 37s3RD 11:59–12:30 · 31s3RD 13:45–14:20 · 35s3RD 16:39–17:06 · 27sPenalty: Penalty: GGoal: Daniil But — he was on the iceGGoal: Vincent TrocheckPenalty: GGoal: Mikhail SergachevGGoal: Auston MatthewsPenalty: Penalty: Penalty: GGoal: Dylan Guenther — he was on the iceGGoal: Jack RoslovicGGoal: MacKenzie WeegarPenalty: GGoal: John TavaresPenalty: GGoal: Gavin McKennaPenalty: Solid blocks = his shifts · circles = goals (team colour) · triangles = penalties

The Grade Sheet

Every player’s grades for this game, split into forwards, defense and goalies. Pick the Chart, Tiers or the full Table, and show one team or both. In the Table, tap any column heading to sort — tap again to reverse. Each name opens that player’s own page for this game.

Forwards

8.7
8.0
7.9
7.8
7.8
7.7
ButLW
7.6
7.5
7.4
7.4
7.3
7.0
6.9
LeeLW
6.6
6.5
6.4
6.2
6.1
5.9
5.7
5.3
5.2
5.0

Defense

8.6
7.8
7.7
7.1
6.7
6.6
6.5
6.5
6.2
6.1
6.1
5.8
5.7

Goalies

5.7
5.1
Poor <5Below average 5–5.9Average 6–6.9Good 7–7.9Very good 8–8.9Elite 9+
NavigationHomeScoresStandingsPlayersAdvanced AnalyticsMA Insights
MoreGlossarySettings