John Tavares
7.4
Game Grade
8.4
Production
5.8
Quality

His production ran ahead of his analytics. 1 goal and 1 assist on 3 shots, 0.49 expected goals of his own. His team was out-chanced by UTA 0.12 to 0.50 at five-on-five with him on the ice.

1
Goals
1
Assists
0.49
Expected goals
3
Shots on goal
4
Shot attempts
18:03
Time on ice
-1
Plus/minus
9-7
Faceoffs
1
Hits
3:07
Power-play time
0
Takeaways
0
Penalties drawn
His shot attempts
P1 07:59 · snap · shot-on-goal · 0.17 xGP1 08:01 · wrist · missed-shot · 0.06 xGGP3 07:12 · snap · goal · 0.05 xGP3 19:14 · snap · shot-on-goal · 0.21 xG
Tap a shot, or a row below.
4 shots
WhenShotResultxG
snapOn goal0.17
wristMissed0.06
snapGoal0.05
snapOn goal0.21
on goalmissed✕blockedironbigger = better chance

Why this rating

Every ingredient, in goals above what an average player at his position does in the same ice time. Bars to the right added to the score; bars to the left cost him. The parts add up — nothing about the number is hidden.

Production 8.4
Goals+0.75
Primary assists+0.70
His own chances+0.25
His own scoring chances+0.01
Faceoffs+0.02
Quality 5.8
Chances created on ice-0.14
Goals for on ice-0.22
Chances allowed on ice-0.09
Goals against on ice-0.51
Power-play chances on ice+0.21
Power-play goals on ice+0.19
Usage: competition minus teammates+0.01

How the Game Grade works — the full formula.

Finishing: what he deserved

Goals scored against the goals his chances were worth. One game of finishing is mostly luck, which is exactly why Production and Quality are separate numbers.

Goals scored
1
Expected goals
0.49

4 attempts: 3 on goal, 1 missed, 0 blocked. 3 of his own unblocked attempts came from the high-danger area (dashed outline on the map); a blocked shot carries no expected goals.

On-ice impact, five-on-five

TOR on the left, UTA on the right — first with him on the ice, then with him on the bench. Counts, never percentages.

With Tavares on the ice
0.12
Expected goals
0.50
5
Shot attempts
12
0
High-danger chances
4
1
Scoring chances
4
Without him
0.88
Expected goals
1.32
25
Shot attempts
33
6
High-danger chances
9
11
Scoring chances
14

Who he played against

The UTA skaters he saw most, by shared ice time, and how the chances went in those minutes — the "was it a hard night?" context no score sheet has.

Logan Cooley C · 8:58 together
0.61
0.29
Vincent Trocheck C · 8:18 together
0.58
0.27
MacKenzie Weegar D · 7:19 together
0.88
0.19
Nate Schmidt D · 7:05 together
0.52
0.31
Dylan Guenther RW · 6:54 together
0.10
0.32

Expected goals for TOR (left) and UTA (right) while both were on the ice. Linemates: Nylander 12:52 · Raddysh 11:31 · Cowan 8:02 · Marchenko 7:15.

Score sheet by situation

The raw line, split by game state.

SituationTOIGASOGAttixGxG forxG agst
Five-on-five12:0600000.000.120.50
Even strength12:5000000.000.120.50
Power play3:0711230.280.740.00

Where this game ranks for him

Every one of his 6 rated games this season as a dot; this one highlighted.

1st best of 6 by Game Grade
456789
By Quality alone
456789
By Production alone
456789

Game timeline

All 20 shifts across the game, with goals and penalties on top. When he played, how he was used late, and whether he was on the ice for the goals. Ice time per period underneath.

1ST · 5:262ND · 4:203RD · 8:171ST 0:24–1:19 · 55s1ST 3:57–4:39 · 42s1ST 6:51–8:10 · 79s1ST 12:51–13:34 · 43s1ST 15:39–16:05 · 26s1ST 17:37–18:58 · 81s2ND 0:30–1:00 · 30s2ND 4:01–5:16 · 75s2ND 10:08–11:12 · 64s2ND 13:07–13:51 · 44s2ND 16:29–17:00 · 31s2ND 19:04–19:20 · 16s3RD 0:00–0:34 · 34s3RD 2:16–4:02 · 106s3RD 6:39–7:12 · 33s3RD 10:41–12:00 · 79s3RD 13:19–13:45 · 26s3RD 14:20–15:14 · 54s3RD 16:05–16:39 · 34s3RD 17:49–20:00 · 131sPenalty: Penalty: GGoal: Daniil ButGGoal: Vincent Trocheck — he was on the icePenalty: GGoal: Mikhail SergachevGGoal: Auston Matthews — he was on the icePenalty: Penalty: Penalty: GGoal: Dylan GuentherGGoal: Jack RoslovicGGoal: MacKenzie Weegar — he was on the icePenalty: GGoal: John Tavares — he was on the icePenalty: GGoal: Gavin McKenna — he was on the icePenalty: Solid blocks = his shifts · circles = goals (team colour) · triangles = penalties

The Grade Sheet

Every player’s grades for this game, split into forwards, defense and goalies. Pick the Chart, Tiers or the full Table, and show one team or both. In the Table, tap any column heading to sort — tap again to reverse. Each name opens that player’s own page for this game.

Forwards

8.7
8.0
7.9
7.8
7.8
7.7
ButLW
7.6
7.5
7.4
7.4
7.3
7.0
6.9
LeeLW
6.6
6.5
6.4
6.2
6.1
5.9
5.7
5.3
5.2
5.0

Defense

8.6
7.8
7.7
7.1
6.7
6.6
6.5
6.5
6.2
6.1
6.1
5.8
5.7

Goalies

5.7
5.1
Poor <5Below average 5–5.9Average 6–6.9Good 7–7.9Very good 8–8.9Elite 9+
NavigationHomeScoresStandingsPlayersAdvanced AnalyticsMA Insights
MoreGlossarySettings