Marshall Rifai
6.2
Game Grade
6.7
Production
6.2
Quality

A night that matched the numbers. 0 goals and 0 assists on 0 shots, 0.00 expected goals of his own. His team was out-chanced by UTA 0.03 to 0.41 at five-on-five with him on the ice.

0
Points
0
Goals
0
Assists
0
Plus/minus
0.24
Expected goals for
0.41
Expected goals against
9:04
Time on ice
-2
Net high-danger chances
3
Blocked shots
1:01
Penalty-kill time
0:00
Power-play time
0
Hits
Chances against while he was on the ice
P1 13:51 · Barrett Hayton · missed-shot · 0.03 xGP2 02:23 · Jack McBain · missed-shot · 0.06 xGP2 11:04 · Logan Cooley · missed-shot · 0.03 xGP3 01:50 · Kailer Yamamoto · shot-on-goal · 0.06 xGP3 06:32 · Logan Cooley · shot-on-goal · 0.02 xGP3 06:33 · Vincent Trocheck · shot-on-goal · 0.20 xG
Tap a shot, or a row below.
6 shots
WhenShooterShotResultxG
Barrett Hayton—Missed0.03
Jack McBain—Missed0.06
Logan Cooley—Missed0.03
Kailer Yamamoto—On goal0.06
Logan Cooley—On goal0.02
Vincent Trocheck—On goal0.20
His own shot attempts
on goalmissed✕blockedironbigger = better chance

Why this rating

Every ingredient, in goals above what an average player at his position does in the same ice time. Bars to the right added to the score; bars to the left cost him. The parts add up — nothing about the number is hidden.

Production 6.7
Blocks+0.15
Quality 6.2
Chances created on ice-0.35
Goals for on ice-0.10
Chances allowed on ice-0.25
Goals against on ice+0.32
Penalty-kill goals against on ice+0.01

How the Game Grade works — the full formula.

On-ice impact, five-on-five

TOR on the left, UTA on the right — first with him on the ice, then with him on the bench. Counts, never percentages.

With Rifai on the ice
0.03
Expected goals
0.41
5
Shot attempts
10
0
High-danger chances
3
2
Scoring chances
4
Without him
0.97
Expected goals
1.41
25
Shot attempts
35
6
High-danger chances
10
10
Scoring chances
14

Who he played against

The UTA skaters he saw most, by shared ice time, and how the chances went in those minutes — the "was it a hard night?" context no score sheet has.

MacKenzie Weegar D · 3:47 together
0.00
0.26
Nate Schmidt D · 3:42 together
0.03
0.09
John Marino D · 3:38 together
0.24
0.15
Kailer Yamamoto RW · 3:15 together
0.21
0.09
Barrett Hayton C · 3:03 together
0.21
0.09

Expected goals for TOR (left) and UTA (right) while both were on the ice. Partner and linemates: McKenna 3:57 · Paul 3:05 · Ekman-Larsson 3:05 · Matthews 2:49.

Finishing: what he deserved

Goals scored against the goals his chances were worth. One game of finishing is mostly luck, which is exactly why Production and Quality are separate numbers.

Goals scored
0
Expected goals
0.00

0 attempts: 0 on goal, 0 missed, 0 blocked. 0 of his own unblocked attempts came from the high-danger area (dashed outline on the map); a blocked shot carries no expected goals.

Score sheet by situation

The raw line, split by game state.

SituationTOIGASOGAttixGxG forxG agst
Five-on-five8:0300000.000.030.41
Even strength8:0300000.000.030.41
Penalty kill1:0100000.000.210.00

Where this game ranks for him

Every one of his 1 rated games this season as a dot; this one highlighted.

1st best of 1 by Game Grade
456789
By Quality alone
456789
By Production alone
456789

Game timeline

All 13 shifts across the game, with goals and penalties on top. When he played, how he was used late, and whether he was on the ice for the goals. Ice time per period underneath.

1ST · 2:452ND · 3:183RD · 3:011ST 0:57–1:30 · 33s1ST 6:22–6:51 · 29s1ST 10:06–10:33 · 27s1ST 13:26–14:09 · 43s1ST 17:03–17:36 · 33s2ND 1:41–2:36 · 55s2ND 10:29–11:32 · 63s2ND 14:17–14:57 · 40s2ND 19:20–20:00 · 40s3RD 1:10–1:52 · 42s3RD 4:13–4:50 · 37s3RD 6:10–6:39 · 29s3RD 9:33–10:46 · 73sPenalty: Penalty: GGoal: Daniil ButGGoal: Vincent TrocheckPenalty: GGoal: Mikhail SergachevGGoal: Auston MatthewsPenalty: Penalty: Penalty: GGoal: Dylan GuentherGGoal: Jack RoslovicGGoal: MacKenzie WeegarPenalty: GGoal: John TavaresPenalty: GGoal: Gavin McKennaPenalty: Solid blocks = his shifts · circles = goals (team colour) · triangles = penalties

The Grade Sheet

Every player’s grades for this game, split into forwards, defense and goalies. Pick the Chart, Tiers or the full Table, and show one team or both. In the Table, tap any column heading to sort — tap again to reverse. Each name opens that player’s own page for this game.

Forwards

8.7
8.0
7.9
7.8
7.8
7.7
ButLW
7.6
7.5
7.4
7.4
7.3
7.0
6.9
LeeLW
6.6
6.5
6.4
6.2
6.1
5.9
5.7
5.3
5.2
5.0

Defense

8.6
7.8
7.7
7.1
6.7
6.6
6.5
6.5
6.2
6.1
6.1
5.8
5.7

Goalies

5.7
5.1
Poor <5Below average 5–5.9Average 6–6.9Good 7–7.9Very good 8–8.9Elite 9+
NavigationHomeScoresStandingsPlayersAdvanced AnalyticsMA Insights
MoreGlossarySettings