Kirill Marchenko
7.9
Game Grade
7.2
Production
8.6
Quality

A night that matched the numbers. 0 goals and 1 assist on 2 shots, 0.29 expected goals of his own. His team out-chanced UTA 0.52 to 0.12 at five-on-five with him on the ice.

0
Goals
1
Assists
0.29
Expected goals
2
Shots on goal
4
Shot attempts
18:41
Time on ice
+1
Plus/minus
0-0
Faceoffs
0
Hits
3:20
Power-play time
0
Takeaways
0
Penalties drawn
His shot attempts
P2 04:41 · snap · missed-shot · 0.14 xGP2 09:45 · blocked-shot · 0.00 xGP2 13:57 · snap · shot-on-goal · 0.09 xGP3 19:03 · backhand · shot-on-goal · 0.07 xG
Tap a shot, or a row below.
4 shots
WhenShotResultxG
snapMissed0.14
—Blocked0.00
snapOn goal0.09
backhandOn goal0.07
on goalmissed✕blockedironbigger = better chance

Why this rating

Every ingredient, in goals above what an average player at his position does in the same ice time. Bars to the right added to the score; bars to the left cost him. The parts add up — nothing about the number is hidden.

Production 7.2
Primary assists+0.70
His own chances+0.15
His own scoring chances+0.01
Quality 8.6
Chances created on ice+0.10
Goals for on ice+0.40
Chances allowed on ice+0.58
Goals against on ice-0.06
Power-play chances on ice+0.24
Power-play goals on ice+0.19

How the Game Grade works — the full formula.

Finishing: what he deserved

Goals scored against the goals his chances were worth. One game of finishing is mostly luck, which is exactly why Production and Quality are separate numbers.

Goals scored
0
Expected goals
0.29

4 attempts: 2 on goal, 1 missed, 1 blocked. 1 of his own unblocked attempts came from the high-danger area (dashed outline on the map); a blocked shot carries no expected goals.

On-ice impact, five-on-five

TOR on the left, UTA on the right — first with him on the ice, then with him on the bench. Counts, never percentages.

With Marchenko on the ice
0.52
Expected goals
0.12
13
Shot attempts
4
4
High-danger chances
1
5
Scoring chances
1
Without him
0.48
Expected goals
1.69
17
Shot attempts
41
2
High-danger chances
12
7
Scoring chances
17

Who he played against

The UTA skaters he saw most, by shared ice time, and how the chances went in those minutes — the "was it a hard night?" context no score sheet has.

MacKenzie Weegar D · 13:15 together
1.41
0.00
Mikhail Sergachev D · 12:18 together
1.48
0.00
Lawson Crouse LW · 8:00 together
1.08
0.01
Nick Schmaltz C · 7:10 together
0.95
0.01
Kevin Stenlund C · 6:54 together
0.91
0.00

Expected goals for TOR (left) and UTA (right) while both were on the ice. Linemates: Matthews 16:35 · Roslovic 10:39 · Raddysh 9:42 · Tavares 7:15.

Score sheet by situation

The raw line, split by game state.

SituationTOIGASOGAttixGxG forxG agst
Five-on-five12:1601010.000.520.12
Even strength13:0601010.000.520.12
Power play3:2000120.230.820.00
Penalty kill0:0900000.000.000.00

Where this game ranks for him

Every one of his 7 rated games this season as a dot; this one highlighted.

2nd best of 7 by Game Grade
456789
By Quality alone
456789
By Production alone
456789

Game timeline

All 19 shifts across the game, with goals and penalties on top. When he played, how he was used late, and whether he was on the ice for the goals. Ice time per period underneath.

1ST · 6:082ND · 5:353RD · 6:581ST 0:00–0:32 · 32s1ST 2:46–3:59 · 73s1ST 6:21–8:15 · 114s1ST 11:16–12:08 · 52s1ST 14:55–15:39 · 44s1ST 16:57–17:50 · 53s2ND 0:00–1:00 · 60s2ND 4:01–5:16 · 75s2ND 9:09–10:06 · 57s2ND 13:07–14:05 · 58s2ND 15:49–16:29 · 40s2ND 17:13–17:58 · 45s3RD 0:39–1:16 · 37s3RD 4:07–4:48 · 41s3RD 6:39–7:12 · 33s3RD 9:58–11:01 · 63s3RD 12:30–13:14 · 44s3RD 15:16–15:54 · 38s3RD 17:18–20:00 · 162sPenalty: Penalty: GGoal: Daniil ButGGoal: Vincent Trocheck — he was on the icePenalty: GGoal: Mikhail SergachevGGoal: Auston Matthews — he was on the icePenalty: Penalty: Penalty: GGoal: Dylan GuentherGGoal: Jack Roslovic — he was on the iceGGoal: MacKenzie WeegarPenalty: GGoal: John Tavares — he was on the icePenalty: GGoal: Gavin McKenna — he was on the icePenalty: Solid blocks = his shifts · circles = goals (team colour) · triangles = penalties

The Grade Sheet

Every player’s grades for this game, split into forwards, defense and goalies. Pick the Chart, Tiers or the full Table, and show one team or both. In the Table, tap any column heading to sort — tap again to reverse. Each name opens that player’s own page for this game.

Forwards

8.7
8.0
7.9
7.8
7.8
7.7
ButLW
7.6
7.5
7.4
7.4
7.3
7.0
6.9
LeeLW
6.6
6.5
6.4
6.2
6.1
5.9
5.7
5.3
5.2
5.0

Defense

8.6
7.8
7.7
7.1
6.7
6.6
6.5
6.5
6.2
6.1
6.1
5.8
5.7

Goalies

5.7
5.1
Poor <5Below average 5–5.9Average 6–6.9Good 7–7.9Very good 8–8.9Elite 9+
NavigationHomeScoresStandingsPlayersAdvanced AnalyticsMA Insights
MoreGlossarySettings