Easton Cowan
5.2
Game Grade
6.3
Production
5.3
Quality

Both halves of the grade came in low. 0 goals and 0 assists on 2 shots, 0.14 expected goals of his own. His team was out-chanced by UTA 0.28 to 0.82 at five-on-five with him on the ice.

0
Goals
0
Assists
0.14
Expected goals
2
Shots on goal
4
Shot attempts
16:55
Time on ice
-3
Plus/minus
1-1
Faceoffs
0
Hits
0:36
Power-play time
0
Takeaways
0
Penalties drawn
His shot attempts
P1 01:10 · blocked-shot · 0.00 xGP1 04:12 · snap · shot-on-goal · 0.04 xGP2 03:47 · slap · shot-on-goal · 0.09 xGP2 15:04 · blocked-shot · 0.00 xG
Tap a shot, or a row below.
4 shots
WhenShotResultxG
—Blocked0.00
snapOn goal0.04
slapOn goal0.09
—Blocked0.00
on goalmissed✕blockedironbigger = better chance

Why this rating

Every ingredient, in goals above what an average player at his position does in the same ice time. Bars to the right added to the score; bars to the left cost him. The parts add up — nothing about the number is hidden.

Production 6.3
His own chances+0.07
Blocks+0.05
Quality 5.3
Chances created on ice-0.08
Goals for on ice-0.25
Chances allowed on ice-0.21
Goals against on ice-0.45
Power-play chances on ice+0.01
Power-play goals on ice-0.01
Penalty-kill goals against on ice+0.02
Usage: competition minus teammates+0.01

How the Game Grade works — the full formula.

Finishing: what he deserved

Goals scored against the goals his chances were worth. One game of finishing is mostly luck, which is exactly why Production and Quality are separate numbers.

Goals scored
0
Expected goals
0.14

4 attempts: 2 on goal, 0 missed, 2 blocked. 0 of his own unblocked attempts came from the high-danger area (dashed outline on the map); a blocked shot carries no expected goals.

On-ice impact, five-on-five

TOR on the left, UTA on the right — first with him on the ice, then with him on the bench. Counts, never percentages.

With Cowan on the ice
0.28
Expected goals
0.82
6
Shot attempts
16
1
High-danger chances
5
4
Scoring chances
6
Without him
0.72
Expected goals
1.00
24
Shot attempts
29
5
High-danger chances
8
8
Scoring chances
12

Who he played against

The UTA skaters he saw most, by shared ice time, and how the chances went in those minutes — the "was it a hard night?" context no score sheet has.

John Marino D · 9:05 together
0.05
0.65
Vincent Trocheck C · 7:25 together
0.13
1.10
Nate Schmidt D · 7:09 together
0.05
0.20
Logan Cooley C · 7:04 together
0.27
0.39
Dylan Guenther RW · 6:40 together
0.27
0.41

Expected goals for TOR (left) and UTA (right) while both were on the ice. Linemates: Nylander 8:40 · Tavares 8:02 · Raddysh 7:24 · McCabe 5:55.

Score sheet by situation

The raw line, split by game state.

SituationTOIGASOGAttixGxG forxG agst
Five-on-five13:5600130.040.280.64
Even strength14:3500130.040.280.73
Power play0:3600110.100.090.00
Penalty kill1:4400000.000.100.39
Empty net0:0000000.000.000.18

Where this game ranks for him

Every one of his 7 rated games this season as a dot; this one highlighted.

7th best of 7 by Game Grade
456789
By Quality alone
456789
By Production alone
456789

Game timeline

All 23 shifts across the game, with goals and penalties on top. When he played, how he was used late, and whether he was on the ice for the goals. Ice time per period underneath.

1ST · 4:422ND · 6:103RD · 6:031ST 0:32–1:15 · 43s1ST 2:15–2:47 · 32s1ST 3:58–4:47 · 49s1ST 8:15–8:58 · 43s1ST 12:51–13:39 · 48s1ST 16:06–16:57 · 51s1ST 19:44–20:00 · 16s2ND 1:00–1:48 · 48s2ND 3:36–4:01 · 25s2ND 6:16–6:47 · 31s2ND 7:52–9:09 · 77s2ND 10:56–11:50 · 54s2ND 14:05–15:09 · 64s2ND 16:29–17:13 · 44s2ND 18:53–19:20 · 27s3RD 0:00–0:39 · 39s3RD 2:16–4:07 · 111s3RD 6:27–6:39 · 12s3RD 8:36–9:07 · 31s3RD 11:01–11:58 · 57s3RD 13:14–13:45 · 31s3RD 14:39–15:16 · 37s3RD 15:54–16:39 · 45sPenalty: Penalty: GGoal: Daniil ButGGoal: Vincent TrocheckPenalty: GGoal: Mikhail Sergachev — he was on the iceGGoal: Auston MatthewsPenalty: Penalty: Penalty: GGoal: Dylan Guenther — he was on the iceGGoal: Jack RoslovicGGoal: MacKenzie Weegar — he was on the icePenalty: GGoal: John TavaresPenalty: GGoal: Gavin McKennaPenalty: Solid blocks = his shifts · circles = goals (team colour) · triangles = penalties

The Grade Sheet

Every player’s grades for this game, split into forwards, defense and goalies. Pick the Chart, Tiers or the full Table, and show one team or both. In the Table, tap any column heading to sort — tap again to reverse. Each name opens that player’s own page for this game.

Forwards

8.7
8.0
7.9
7.8
7.8
7.7
ButLW
7.6
7.5
7.4
7.4
7.3
7.0
6.9
LeeLW
6.6
6.5
6.4
6.2
6.1
5.9
5.7
5.3
5.2
5.0

Defense

8.6
7.8
7.7
7.1
6.7
6.6
6.5
6.5
6.2
6.1
6.1
5.8
5.7

Goalies

5.7
5.1
Poor <5Below average 5–5.9Average 6–6.9Good 7–7.9Very good 8–8.9Elite 9+
NavigationHomeScoresStandingsPlayersAdvanced AnalyticsMA Insights
MoreGlossarySettings