Minnesota Wild at Tampa Bay Lightning — 2026-10-08

Thursday, October 8, 2026Final
2–3
SOG: 36 – 35
Watch:MINNHLWild+The Spot

SCORING SUMMARY

P1 14:34
Anthony Cirelli(Erik Cernak, Brandon Hagel)
0–1
P1 13:58
John Carlson(Nikita Kucherov, Brayden Point)
0–2
P2 17:28
Quinn Hughes(Bobby Brink, Jared Spurgeon)
1–2
P2 15:05
John Carlson(Nikita Kucherov, Jake Guentzel)
1–3
4v5
P2 5:59
Blake Coleman(Kirill Kaprizov, Quinn Hughes)
2–3
5v4
MIN
TBL
Expected goals share

TBL controlled play with 52% of expected goals.

3.103.37
High-danger
1920
Chances
3336
Attempts
6270
Shots
3635
Shots by period
1ST
914
TBL 61%
2ND
1210
Even
3RD
1511
MIN 58%
Possession
56.9%
Faceoff %
43.1%
4
Takeaways
3
14
Giveaways · fewer is better
10
Physical & discipline
24
Hits
12
20
Blocks
14
6
Penalty minutes · fewer is better
4
Special teams
Power play · filled = goal, hollow = chance
1 for 2
1 for 3

MA INSIGHTS

Game Summary

Lightning Lean on Carlson and Hildeby to Edge Wild

Kucherov threads the passes as Hughes and Coleman answer for Minnesota in a tight finish at Amalie Arena.

Tampa Bay had the better looks and the puck on its stick more often, and it paid off in a 3-2 win that felt sturdier than the score. The Lightning carried the edge in shot attempts and owned a slight majority of expected goals — the model that values chance quality — at 53.6 percent.

The headline punch came from John Carlson, who buried two while firing nine shots. That volume fit the flow Tampa created, not a one-off heater, and it turned territorial pressure into a real lead. Nikita Kucherov drove the setup game with two helpers, while Brandon Hagel and Anthony Cirelli kept the middle six pushing; Cirelli added the other Tampa goal.

This stayed close because both goalies were sharp. Dennis Hildeby posted plus‑0.90 in goals saved above expected — how many he stole compared with average — and Jesper Wallstedt was positive as well at plus‑0.35. Minnesota’s push came from Quinn Hughes (a goal and an assist) and Blake Coleman’s steady shot volume. Each side struck once on the power play, and with no help from the posts, the difference was Tampa’s chance edge and finish from its top pieces.

— by MA Insights AI —
Read article →
NavigationHomeScoresStandingsPlayersAdvanced AnalyticsMA Insights
MoreGlossarySettings